First there was a Jet, it was speeding too fast and gone out of control and plunges to the sea. It creates Waves strong enough to make everyone on board of the Jet swept across the sea and landing them on an island. They were abandoned by the Jet and the next thing they can do was to look at the Wave, hoping one day there might be someone came to the rescue. This isn’t the LOST series. This is what happened to Samsung Jet owners. A series of mis-promises that Samsung gave to Jet owners. Jet owners were lost, the only saviour is the Jetdroid. Worst of all, Samsung is urging Jet users to upgrade to their new handset Samsung Wave. Well, this is reality, this is business. Anyway, enough of some history lessons. Let’s move on to the real deal here. Samsung Wave S8500, the new handset from Samsung which bundled with loads of new tech never seen before in other phones. The most marketed ones are the Bada OS and Super AMOLED screen. Does it lives up to the hype?

Before the content goes on, pictures first:

And here are the hardware specifications for Samsung Wave S8500:

• 1GHz Samsung Hummingbird Arm Cortex processor
• 512MB of available RAM
• 1.5GB phone storage, with 400MB available only
• 480×800 Super AMOLED capacitive touchsreen @ 3.3inches
• 5MP camera with autofocus and LED flash
• HD video record at 720p @ 30FPS
• Bada OS(Operating System)
• Bluetooth 3.0
• Connectivity – EDGE, 3G, WiFi(supports Wireless-n,802.11n), HSDPA 7.2Mbps, GPS, A-GPS
• Video and audio playability – DivX, WMV, Xvid, h.263, h.264, mp3, WMA, ACC+
• 1500mAh Li-Ion battery

From the specifications above, Samsung Wave S8500 is indeed a very powerful gadget device. Being the most notable one is the 1GHz Samsung Hummingbird Arm Cortex CPU. This CPU is tested to be faster than the 1GHz Snapdragon processor which was found in most high end Android phones like the Google Nexus One, HTC Desire and Sony Ericsson Experia X10. Apart from that, having a fast brain a.k.a processor means nothing if the brain capacity doesn’t have enough space for fast data processing, thus Samsung bundled as much as 512MB of RAM which is quite generous indeed.

As far as the design is concern, the phone was wrapped in a aluminium build with an exception on the top and bottom which is consist of some high quality plastic build. And as for the screen, Samsung decided to upgrade its much touted AMOLED screen for this Wave. It is now Super AMOLED. I won’t go into a technical detail of the difference between Super AMOLED and AMOLED. From a general user perspective, minus out the higher contrast ratio, there weren’t much difference if you compare it side by side in an indoor environment. But taking out to a full blast of sunshine, you might started to note the difference. Super AMOLED is able to produce some readable visual on the screen while AMOLED is completely washed out. Don’t get too excited though, Super AMOLED is only comparable to the standard TFT screen right now, I mean under the sunshine. Don’t expect to get a clear clarity of the screen like what you get back during monochrome days.

The next big thing from this phone is the Bluetooth 3.0 and wireless-n connectivity. These two are pretty new, and you might not find it in your computer right now.

Bluetooth 3.0 is an upgrade over the previous Bluetooth generation, it provides transfer rate of 24Mbps. One thing about Bluetooth 3.0, the faster transfer rate is not done by the Bluetooth chip itself. The Bluetooth hardware only manages the connection establishment, while the data transfer is done via the 802.11 protocol. So, technically, any phones with Bluetooth and a 802.11 build-in is capable of having a Bluetooh 3.0 upgrade. nextpage–>

HTC Wildfire

I start with the recently released Android incarnation from HTC. It is called the Wildfire. Well, catchy name, designed wise might not well suited to its nomenclature though. That might be changed if you get the red version of Wildfire. Oh, before I forgot, there are four colours available. Brown, black, red and white silver. Personal preference, white silver is the one to get. Thus, I’ve attached the picture here in silver.

….and the boring brown like you have seen in Desire as well.

More pictures available here http://www.htc.com/uk/product/wildfire/gallery.html

I have to say, great job HTC. The colours availability is quite an advantage, and it gives consumers more choices.

Okay, physical appearance aside. Let’s see whether this Wildfire is as beauty as skin deep.

• 528MHz Qualcomm processor, same as HTC Tattoo
• 384MB RAM, 512MB ROM
• 3.2inch TFT capacitive touchsreen @ 240×320 resolution
• 3G, WiFi, EDGE, bluetooth
• 5MP with LED and autofocus camera lense
• GPS hardware with A-GPS
• 1300mAh Li-ion battery
• Android 2.1 OS (Eclair)

One word about it, the specs is nothing to shout about. 528MHz MSM7225 Qualcomm processor and the TFT screen is kinda outdated, well, that’s what you get at what you paid for. The rest of the specs is kinda standard these days. Did I mention the price? Contract-free at RM1200(USD350) is almost halfed of the cost of Desire and almost RM500(USD160) cheaper than the HTC Legend. But on the other hand, with 1300mAh battery capacity, you can expect to get a long usage on a single charge. Engadget reported of having 12hours of 3G connection, which is quite impressive.

Upgradability to Froyo is no where to be seen. That might be changed if the sales of Wildfire is really wild though. But with HTC Sense UI and at an enticing price, this phone is the budget Android phone to get. Or is it? Let’s look up for the next contender from Samsung.

Samsung Galaxy 3

Samsung attempted budget Androids back a year ago with Galaxy Spica, though didn’t welcomed much by the masses. Now Samsung made an upgrade for its Galaxy phones lineup. Of course, this review isn’t about the super expensive high specs Galaxy S, this one is called Galaxy 3. I certainly have no idea about the naming convention that Samsung trying to use here, as there were no Galaxy 1 or 2 before this. Anyway, here are the specifications.

The buttons situated on the left and right is actually touch-sensitive button employed with capacitive touchscreen technology, while the center button is a 5-ways navigation D-pad which also brings up the menu once pressed on the centre.

The upside about this phone is the Touchwiz 3.0 interface which Samsung uses. It isn’t as elegant as the HTC Sense UI, but it was certainly better than the standard UI found on the vanilla version of Android Eclair. Another plus point is the support for various video codecs natively, so you don’t have to get any 3rd party apps to watch any short clips in DivX or WMV format. Kudos to Samsung for this.

The major downside, yeah, you saw it. Is the lacked of LED flash and the lowly 3.2MP camera. While some may argue this is more to smartphone, but hey, having an LED flash does helps a lot. Another complain is the WQVGA screen ratio. 400×240 is not the standard available on phones these days. Which means, the apps you downloaded from the Android market might not be supported on your phone.

Anyway, Samsung Galaxy 3 was just announced, so you might not get it that soon. Pricing should be at the range as HTC Wildfire. Based on the specs, I suspect it could be cheaper. Falling to the range of Sony Ericsson X10 mini is great. next page >>

Fastest internet web browser opera 10.50

10 years back, during the days when 56K modem and icq dominated our daily net-life, Opera version 5&6 was my tool for interacting with web pages. It was only when incompatibility happens that I use Internet Explorer once in a while.

Blame it on Firefox, the reason i abandoned Opera back in 2004. The rest of the history was Firefox, Firefox 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 …. and till most recently Chrome. Google Chrome was nice. Initially it doesn’t impressed me much. The memory leak problem which plagued Firefox in all version is where I started to look for alternative. One very obvious advantage over Firefox is the look and feel, which is sleeker and the browser startup time was faster compared to Firefox.

Opera 10.50 released just recently is where I used it as an alternative browser to my main browser Chrome. Apart from the faster javascript performance. Opera 10.50 triumph over Google Chrome with some added functionalities like:

• Opera Unite, multipurpose server-like functionality available just on your browser.
• E-mail application
• Chat(IRC) application
• Torrent client
• better download manager with ability to resume download tasks which isn’t possible with Google Chrome.
• Mouse gesture
• Widgets
• Opera Turbo, great tool for slow connections. (Compress web pages up to 80%)

There are two complains about Opera 10.50 though; the compatibility issue and it wasn’t multithreaded. Compatibility issue becomes apparent when I access my favourite web messenger www.meebo.com. The javascript incompatibility causes the “window” inside the meebo chat application to behave erratically. As far as multithreaded is concern, Opera browser doesn’t have this, yet. But this shouldn’t be much of an issue for average users as Opera simply reopen the tabs once Opera crashed.

I do recommend Opera 10.50 (the latest is a minor update 10.53). Let go your Firefox, and please stay away from Internet Explorer. I am using Opera in conjunction with Chrome. Well, it was like sort of 40% Opera and 60% Chrome. Both are nice in their own aspect. Opera is more than a browser, it is an whole internet application suite.

Downloads and more info at http://www.opera.com/

<< back

• Nokia 5800 Express Music
  

  Nokia 5800 Express Music

Basically the best bang for buck touchscreen smartphone out there. It has almost all the features you looking for; 3.2inch TFT LCD  resistive touchscreen, 3.15Mp camera, wifi, 3.5mm audio jack, multimedia playback capabilities and tonnes of Symbian apps available. With an added bonus; square bulky plastic build which acts as an antithesis to the featureless yet beautiful iPhone. If you don’t mind the extra bonus, costing at ~RM1k(USD 310), this phone is a real bargain.

• Nokia E63
  

  Nokia e63 Smartphone

Yet, another smartphone from Nokia dominates this recommended chart. It is actually the hugely popular Nokia E71 with chopped off hardware; without the aluminium casing and the front facing VGA camera. Priced under RM1k(USD310), choosing between this E63 and 5800 XM is a no brainer; E63 for better faster texting and for those who dislikes touchscreen. Otherwise, go for 5800 XM for bigger screen and touch ability.

• Sony Ericsson W705 Walkman
  

  Sony Ericsson W705

I would say, the best budget Walkman series so far. Walkman phone from my opinion, is basically dead. It was sad to see these great series of Walkman phones just died at a mere 4.5years old. It is a small brother to W995. At the same price range as Nokia 5800 XM, it isn’t a smartphone though. Purely aim for music lovers who need a phone with great music capabilities. Untill the price of W995 drops further more, this is the best wifi- enabled Walkman phone which doesn’t hurt your wallet that much.

• Samsung Corby Wifi S3650
  

  Samsung Corby s3650 Wifi

With its cute trendy design, Samsung’s original Corby managed to win the hearts of many. It draw sales big enough to convince Samsung in making another revision; same phone with an added wifi capability. This phone is targeted at youngsters in mind (girls especially), and it’s basically an anti-gadget-freak phone. And at the cost of under RM750(USD210), this phone is a big recommendation for the average teenagers. On top of that, its build in Dolphin internet browser is a bonus. Good mobile internet experience is at least a guarantee here.

<< back

Installing an OS for a handset(Android in this respect) is not as straightforward as it is for a computer.

1. You have to get the bootloader to boot up the Android OS. Thus, needing to mod the bootloader comes with the handset.
2. Since 3rd party OS will be installed on the SD card for safety reason(you won’t screw up if it fails), it would be necessary to initialize the SD card upon booting as well.
3. Compiling the Android OS which includes all the necessary drivers for booting up the handset. Initial stage may only need the crucial parts only like the AMOLED screen, CPU, memory controller, storage controller and the touch input.
4. Get all the hardware drivers

Of course, the above mentioned are just a rough explanation, but you get the idea here.  It isn’t easy and these people dedicated to make this possible deserves an applause.  On top of that, they didn’t get any payment whatsoever. But it was sickening for seeing people asking the status of the project all the time. Reminds me of stupid Project Manager in an IT firm.

If you are deemed to be skillful enough , please pay a visit to  Jetdroid Group

**Omnia II which shares almost similiar hardware as Jet, already has been successfully ported an Android OS onto it. But it was slow and some hardwares were not usable.

• Press the Windows Logo Key + R, it brings up the RUN window.
• Type gpedit.msc and enter.
• go to user configuration > Administrative Templates > System >  Ctrl+Alt+Del Options
• double click Remove Task Manager.
• Choosing Enabled will disable the Task Manager. As explained in the description there; “If this setting is enabled and users try to start Task Manager, a message appears explaining that a policy prevents the action”.
• Click Apply/OK after that.
• Disabled option is to enable the Task Manager.

This new Motorola Android phone is the next evolution from Droid. Sleek is what makes this phone shine. It was already selling in Korean market and the States should get this phone by this month. What distinct this phone with any other phones is its ability to output HD content through its mini-HDMI port. The rest of the specifications are 3.7inch touchscreen, 8mp autofocus camera with xenon flash and 720p video recording.

New Android phone Galaxy S from Samsung

Boasting a 4inch AMOLED screen, this phone is beautiful. While not as sleek as others, it doesn’t feel cheap and quality of the build is there. While the 5Mp camera is kinda letdown, it was supplemented by 720p HD video recording capability. For storage, it has 16gb build in memory and expandable via microSD. No doubt, its triumph card is its crisp and clear AMOLED screen.

HTC desire with Android 2.1 operating system

HTC manufactured Google Nexus One. You can expect HTC to sell one with similiar features. And what you got now is the HTC Desire. It was basically a Nexus one with slightly sleeker design and slightly more RAM. What made up the Desire? 1GHz Snapdragon processor,  576MB Ram, 5mp camera and of course  Sense UI. Availability circa Q2-Q3 2010.

During the heydays of Nokia 3310, people are only limited to WAP based mobile internet. It was so limited and nobody bothered to surf net using their mobile back then. Few years later, phones with 65k colours TFT LCD are booming like mushrooms. There are at least few people used their phones to surf some WAP sites via GPRS/EDGE and that’s including me. The Sony Ericsson T610 is classic, serving me for 4years before I decided to retire it.

With the introduction of iPhone, the mobile industry was revolutionized. Mobile service provider is selling the phone with data package. It’s very enticing since most service provider absorbed the hefty price of the iPhone by signing up with the consumers with 1-2years contract(not in Malaysia, a 2year contract still cost a premium). Mobile provider take note of this idea and introduce it with other phones as well like the HTC android series. Although 3G was introduced many years before iPhone, not many afford to use this data service without a data plan. It was iPhone who revolutionize the service provider in providing affordable data plan + voice call + cheap phones (again, not in Malaysia).

What’s next after 3G? For your sake, it isn’t iZzi 4G network (refer to my intro paragraph). Long Term Evolution (LTE) is the next step after 3G. While it was only considered as pre-4G as it doesn’t meet some of the requirements to be adhered to the 4G specifications. Some countries already initiated trial and testing and branded it as 4G. Some of the countries including Stockholm and Oslo. The latest was Singapore where SingTel demo the technology by streaming HD content to a tablet PC.

LTE will be absorbed into 4G family though it doesn’t comply with the 4G standards. As far as business is concern, carriers will most likely to market it as 4G instead of “pre-4G” or “3.9G” which represents the correct term.

Here are the specifications of LTE:

• Downlink speed of 100Mbps.
• Uplink of 50Mbps
• idle to active at ~ 100ms
• reduced latency at 10ms
• IP based wireless network, no more analogue voice packet. Voice calls are being done via VOIP.
• IPv6 support. IPv4 no longer sufficient to sustain this much of connected device by then.

Basically, LTE is fall short of the bandwidth requirements as 4G; downlink speed of 1Gbps when client is stationary and 100Mbps for mobile operation. And also the efficiency of the burst rate.

The true 4G technology will be LTE-Advance. Its specification were only finalized at late 2009.  Apart from that, mobile-WiMax is competing with LTE-Advance to get the nomenclature. I say, both will complement each other and hardware manufacturer will probably support both technology in the same package. In the mean time, HSDPA 3.5G is not even utilized fully. There are no killer applications that can take advantage of that massive bandwidth for mobile by factoring in the cost. Untill bandwidth becomes cheap, don’t try to watch Youtube HD on your mobile.

iPhone with it's ubiquitous interface

One thing I really impress with Apple is their creativity and marketing. They are able to inject much ideas on a phone which really brings much wow to all of us. Pinching (another word for zooming in iPhone), land scape mode with auto rotate, intuitive menu design and colours … are just some of the fun features which you can’t find in any phones at that time. Even before Apple roll out iPhones to network carriers, Apple has been doing intensive marketing for their new phone. The Macworld Expo which Steve Jobs did a demo on the fruit phone is very interesting back then. Guess what, they got itself free marketing by having this video of the demo spread around the internet by link exchange and word of mouth. I still remember viewing that video and immediately, “I must get this phone” is what appears in my brain. But wait, Apple is known for its overpriced product, new phone like this wouldn’t be cheap. And yes, it’s pricey. It cost and arm and a leg without subsidy from network carriers. Apart from that, it lacked basic features like MMS, retrieving SIM card info and that includes all your contacts which you saved in your SIM, 3G, pathetic camera, custom ringtone…etc, thus making the first version of iPhone a no no to me. But Apple has been upgrading their iPhone consistently since then; added 3G support, better camera, faster processor, and better LCD screen just to name a few. What we have now is iPhone 3GS, a big upgrade software and hardware wise compared to the first version of iPhone.

Android OS

Android phones on the other hand, is kinda different from the iPhone. First of all, it’s an open source platform. Secondly, it(the OS) was developed by Open handset Alliance and it’s up to any manufacturer to implement any hardware they want. The end result was, a very customizable platform where manufacturer can easily use this OS on any of their new phones as long as it meets the hardware requirements. So, you can have a budget phone with Android installed and another one with all the high end features. Even better is, the Android can be skinned with customizable menu. Take some of the Android phones as example; HTC Hero, Sony Ericsson Rachael and Moto Droid. 3 of them are different in the UI design as HTC and Sony Ericsson re-design the whole UI on Android while Motorola decided to use the vanilla version of Android 2.0. While being open source, this OS is not as intuitive and fun-looking compared to iPhone’s proprietary OS which is version 3.1 now. To be honest, it was quite plain and boring. But that changed after looking at the Sony Ericsson Rachael’s UI (below).

Impressive? Ya, thats the same feeling I had back when I first watch iPhone preview demo.

Same as iPhone OS, Android lacked basic features in the earlier version though not as much as iPhone. But with consistent updates from Google, many of the features were added in every new version. The newest version Android 2.0 is very impressive. It supports higher resolution, optimized for faster hardware speed and better virtual keyboard. Sony Ericsson Rachael is based on Anroid 2.0 for your info.

As usual, I detailed out both platform in simple point forms.

Why you should get iPhone?

• Good internet device. Its mobile Safari browser tops every other mobile browser.
• A true smarter-than-usual-smartphones (sorry Samsung Jet). Has over 100,000 applications available for download and has very good build-in organizer applications.
• Top notch user interface, fool-proof in other words. You don’t have to spend whole day to configure certain settings.
• Great design; either physically or internally(the OS). Appealing for fashion conscious and show-off types alike.
• Very good touch interface and user input. With capacitive touch technology and a 3.5″ screen, giving inputs to the iPhone is non other than just contact your finger and the screen only. The keyboard is well designed and big enough (landscape mode) for swift email/sms typing.

..and why you shouldn’t.

• Overpriced. If there are no subsidy from telco, this phone cost a premium and it’s certainly not worth for that kind of hardware specifications.
• Poor audio output. For this beautiful phone, having lower-than-low-end speakers is certainly worth to give Apple a slap in their face.
• Poor call quality. Many have complained since the first iteration of iPhone, Apple simply never listen.
• Customization sucks. Skinning the OS or at least having different themes was not possible. Guess what, you can’t change the message tones and you’ll be bored with the default tones.
• Poor multimedia capability. Mp3 and video playback is sucks and it doesn’t support a myriad of common video and audio codecs.
• No Flash support. What? Yeah, having a great browser minus the support for Flash is certainly an Achilles’ heel for the iPhone. This limits to only capable of browsing plain&boring websites on the iPhone.
• No GPS. Another what? You are paying a premium for this phone and it doesn’t comes with GPS? Relax, there is A-GPS. If your position is badly covered by your telco’s signal it basically means nothing as A-GPS needed data from the internet.
• In summary, your iPhone is basically dead without internet connectivity.

Why you should get Android?

• Better hardware specifications. Supports higher resolution both camera and screen, and faster processor 1GHz like the SE Rachael.
• Decently bundled Google applications. Gmail, and Google maps with free directional navigation make it the winning key for Android 2.0 phones.
• Customization is better. You can get different themes and skin and you can customize your own tones.
• Google voice support.

..and why you shouldn’t.

• Applications from Android Market might not compatible with your phone. This is contributed by the fact that there are different hardware configurations for the same OS.
• Phone designs might not as appealing to some.
• A great variety of phone models and brand is confusing.

As confusing as it is, both platform has its pros and cons. Apple controls the hardware implementation which results having pathetic hardware specifications; high end smart phone with 3.2 megapixels camera only? Knock knock Jobs… But on the other hand, the brilliant human-device interface (the iPhone OS interface for your sake) + loads of apps available on Apple store, makes the iPhone an appealing choice for tech freaks who are looking for a smartphone. If you’re looking for a phone which packed a punch for its multimedia prowess, iPhone indeed sucks here. Forgot to mention, iPhone’s call quality is below average. >> next page
<< back

Roughly 1.5years back, ATI introduced the Radeon 3 series. It was an upgrade and speed bump for the Radeon 2 series which based on the same architecture R600. The 3 series from ATI wasn’t that competitive agaisnt the Geforce 9 series. But ATI lowered their price and compete in the middle and lower end segment. The Radeon 2 series  from my opinion, wasn’t a good product. It was reminiscent of the Phenom K10 architecture. It only starts to shine when AMD/ATI make a transition to 55nm manufacturing process for its 2400 and 2600 graphic processing unit. We can get cheap mainstream graphic card back then like the 8600GT from nvidia or the 3670 from ATI.

In the mid of 2008, is an even better time for graphic market. This is when ATI introduces the R700 family of graphic cards. The spotlight is on ATI 4850, the fastest mainstream at a reasonable price at that time. Performance was close and faster in some cases than the Geforce 9800 GTX which priced higher than the 4850. Nvidia couldn’t afford to lose market and lowered down their high end product to mainstream prices to compete with 4850. From top to bottom, ATI 4 series(R700) own all the performance crown in every segment. It was indeed a good year for ATI and a better year for consumers.

Ok, enough of history lesson. Today we have the Geforce GT200 series, the ATI 4 series (R700) and 5 series (Evergreen). The GT200 wasn’t really shine untill nvidia migrate the manufacturing process to 55nm earlier this year (or the very end of 2008). It was too hot and too expensive to produced using the 65nm. While ATI doesn’t have any new graphic other than the 4770 and 4890 for the first 9months of this year. Therefore, with competitive pricing from nvidia and the newly improved GT260 and GT285 later on, ATI would have to lower their prices as well. A very good first half of 2009 for consumers I would say. To sum up for today’s graphic card market, starting from the oldest to newest graphics family and from low end to high end segment:

ATI R700 family of GPU (Graphic Processing Unit), Radeon 4 series:

• The 4650 and 4670 remained the best bang for buck in the lower segment.
• Scant availability of 4830 means it is in the process of phasing out. And with the price that is almost similiar with 4850. It’s best just to forget the former and get the later for more performance at just slightly few bucks more.
• The same goes to the 40nm Radeon 4 series – 4770 GPU. Worst is, 4770 is getting pricier than 4850.
• The most popular card of 2008 – Radeon 4850 is getting pricier, no thanks to the fact that this card is getting lesser due to low production from ATI. But anyway, is still the best lower mid range card for today’s standard.
• With strong competition from nvidia GTX260, the Radeon 4870 is tied with GTX260 at the same price range. It’s hard to recommend either one, it boils down to which game you played most. But I would recommend 4870 as it is faster in most games, if Phsyx matters for you then GTX260 is the one to go.
• Radeon 4890 while just an overclocked version of Radeon 4870,  was more overclocker friendly than 4870. With 30-40% higher selling price than 4870, 4890 has the upper hand in performance after maximum overclock. But if you’re not into overclocking, it’s best just to settle with nvidia GTX260 or 4870 or maybe the new Evergreen 5850( more on it later).

Nvidia GT200 GPU

• Lower end for these family of GPU is better be left out for recommendation list. However, the newly released GT240 which is based on 40nm and doesn’t require extra power connector is the one to look for. But since it couldn’t be found selling anywhere in stores and with unknown price yet, this segment had AMD’s Radeon 4650/4670 won hands down.
• GTX260 is only worth for your penny if you are looking for GPGPU applications . Else, just go for Radeon 4870.
• In the range of high end GT200, it’s hardly recommendable for anyone. With ATI’s Evergreen took back the performance crown at competitive pricing, I don’t see reasons to get the GTX285. The GTX295 is still reasonable choice as ATI Radeon 5970 is simply overpriced.

ATI Radeon Evergreen GPU (R800)

• There are no low end cards in this family of GPU yet, but expect AMD/ATI to release Redwood early next year (January possibly). My speculation is, given the performance that we see from this new Evergreen architecture, this would make 9800GT and GTX240 irrelevant as Redwood will be position at that price range. It wouldn’t replace 4650/4670 initially, but expect it to do so by end of next year.
• Juniper is the latest mid range card from AMD/ATI. It is basically half of horse power from Cypress(see below). The 5770 is almost as fast as 4870, but in some cases it was actually slower by few frame rates. Well, that doesn’t concern me with an extra added feature like DirectX 11 and bit streaming. 5770 vs GTX260 vs 4870 at the same price range, I definitely be going for 5770.
• The fastest single chip GPU fall into the hands of Cypress. There are two variant, 5870 and the cut down version 5850. Though 5870′s performance is remarkable, but its price is a bit on the high side no thanks to the non-competition from nvidia and the limited stock available. 5850 on the other hand is really the card to get this year, having performance which is faster than nvidia GTX285 with lower price tag. But it faces the similiar problem with 5870 as well, is very hard to get this card and some shops actually marked up the price above market level.
• ATI/AMD decided to name their dual chip Cypress as Hemlock with their high end named 5970. Boasting two 5870 chip in one card, this is a beast. The 5870 is already insanely fast, having two of them makes nightmare to nvidia. While having the fastest frame rates in all games, this card is not for the faint hearted. Prepare to churn out a big hole in your bank account for this card.

So there you have it, a detailed summary of every discrete graphic families available in the market now. But many of you have guessed, why it isn’t a good time to upgrade your 2-4 years old graphic card now?( thats a different story if you are getting a new PC man )  Well, first of all, availability problem causes some of the most popular graphic card to hike up in price. The Radeon 4850 and nvidia GTX260 is actually pricier than few months back. The new Evergreen graphic from ATI is even in the worst case here, the Radeon 5850, 5870 and 5950 have very little available globablly. Inadvertently causing some stores to mark up their prices. While the cheaper variant of the Evergreen; 5770 and 5750 is just slightly better in the position. The lower end card like the Radeon 4670 and 4650 are still available and getting very affordable these days, but if you are upgrading your graphic card, you won’t get these cards right? My advice, is actually worth to play the wait game just for few more months now. This is what will happen: ATI will ramp up production for their Evergreen graphics family in January, the lower end Redwood will show up Q1, nvidia Fermi will show up by March best case scenario. It’s a very interesting 1st half. If Fermi perform half as good as what nvidia claim, that would be already enough to make ATI lower down their pricey Cypress and Hemlock, and price wars ignite. It’s good for the consumer in the end, you see, im not a fan boy in either side. I’m a fan boy of any side which can produce cheap, efficient, and high performing card, and I believe everyone should.